The main thing the world wants from the Christian churches is to change their teaching on sex and sexuality. And that’s the main thing that liberals within every church want. Philip Rieff, that atheist Jew, understood that back in the 1960s. He saw even then that the Sexual Revolution was going to be the death of Christianity as a strong social force in the West. Why? Because, the sociologist said, “the rejection of sexual individualism” in the Greco-Roman world was “very near the center of the symbolic that has not held.” In Rieff’s particular language, the “symbolic” was the system of meaning within a religion. He said that an attempt to maintain the outward appearance of a religion while abandoning the restraints imposed by its dogma was bound to fail. You cannot have a permissive Christianity, and still have Christianity, said Rieff (who, again, was not a believer, but a sociologist and cultural critic). It’s not that Christianity was against sex and sexuality, but rather that its understanding of what sex is, and what sex is for, is contrary to the way the Roman pagans saw it.
You don’t have to accept Christian sexual morality, of course — but as Rieff saw it, and as I see it, to accept Christianity without also accepting the way Christianity sees the body and sexuality — or to attempt to reform Christianity to make it affirm what it once denied … well, that cannot work. It’s like trying to radically rewrite the rules of football, and say that it’s still football. Traditions — any tradition, sacred or profane — are not infinitely elastic. Borders matter.
Anyway, I’m quite sure that gay and progressive Catholics are dismayed by Francis’s language here, and perhaps even his instruction to keep gays out of the priesthood. They should relax. Papa Bergoglio has done a great deal to advance their cause. The large number of pro-gay progressive bishops he has appointed, his coddling of sexual revolutionaries Father James Martin and Sister Jeannine Gramick, his meeting with transgenders and constant insulting of traditionalists, and more — all of these things are certainly worth an elderly Latino gent saying frociaggine.
Rod Dreher.
Eesh. Seems about right to me, but a lot of it, frankly, I can't bear to think about.